Genocidal

Genocide by Another Name: Russia's War on Ukraine's Children and Identity

Genocide is a word that rightly conjures images of history's most horrific atrocities. But the international legal definition of this crime is broader than mass killing. It includes several distinct acts committed with the specific intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, in whole or in part. One of these codified acts of genocide is the forcible transfer of children from one group to another.

This is not a lesser offense or a footnote in international law; it is a crime that stands alongside mass murder as a tool of annihilation. It is a crime Russia is committing systematically and at a staggering scale in Ukraine.

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, Russia has forcibly deported tens of thousands of Ukrainian children. These children are taken from occupied territories, often separated from their families and guardians, and transported deep into Russian territory. This vast and organized operation is so undeniable that the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Commissioner for Children's Rights, Maria Lvova-Belova. The charge is the war crime of unlawful deportation and transfer of children.

The ultimate goal of this mass abduction is not humanitarian; it is erasure. Once in Russia, these Ukrainian children are subjected to a brutal process of Russification designed to strip them of their heritage and identity. They are placed into "re-education" camps, saturated with pro-Kremlin ideological propaganda, issued Russian passports, and placed for illegal adoption by Russian families. In some cases, their very names are changed. This is a deliberate campaign to make these children forget they are Ukrainian, thereby destroying a piece of the next generation of the Ukrainian nation. Lvova-Belova has even publicly confirmed her role in placing these children with Russian families.

This is a clear strategy of cultural destruction aimed at the most vulnerable. By targeting children, Russia is attacking the future of Ukrainian identity and the survival of Ukrainians as a distinct people. This chilling tactic has been a hallmark of genocidal campaigns throughout history, seen in the forced assimilation of Indigenous children in residential schools and the kidnapping of children by regimes seeking to eradicate a culture. The intent is always the same: to annihilate a group by severing its generational and cultural ties.

The war in Ukraine is being fought on many fronts. While the world's attention is often on the battlefield, a less visible but equally insidious war is being waged against Ukraine's children and its national soul. The forcible transfer and indoctrination of these children is not a byproduct of conflict—it is a central, calculated component of a genocidal strategy. These are not just war crimes; they are the clear and undeniable acts of genocide, as defined by international law.

The Language of Annihilation: How Russian State Media Fuels Genocide

The crime of genocide is unique in international law because it hinges on a specific, documented intent: the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, in whole or in part. The actions themselves—the killings, the deportations, the atrocities—are the terrible evidence, but the intent is the core of the crime. In Russia's war against Ukraine, this intent is not a secret that must be uncovered by historians; it is a matter of public record, broadcast daily on state-controlled television and published by state-run news agencies.

The groundwork for genocide is always laid with language, specifically the language of dehumanization. For years, and with increasing intensity since the full-scale invasion, Russian state media has relentlessly portrayed Ukrainians not as a neighboring people, but as an infestation to be cleansed. Ukrainians are described as "Nazis," "satanists," "subhuman," and "pigs," labels designed to strip them of their humanity and make violence against them not only permissible but righteous. This is a textbook tactic seen throughout history, from the rhetoric of Radio Rwanda to the propaganda of Nazi Germany. It is the essential first step in conditioning a population to accept and even support mass atrocities against a targeted group.

This dehumanization is built on a foundation of identity denial, an ideology championed by Vladimir Putin himself. In his widely publicized essays and speeches, Putin has repeatedly claimed that Ukraine is an artificial state, a historical accident created by the Soviets, and that Ukrainians are not a distinct people but merely a confused offshoot of Russians. This is not a nuanced historical argument; it is the philosophical justification for erasure. If a nation and its people do not have a right to exist, then their destruction cannot be a crime.

From this ideological base springs the most damning evidence of all: direct and public incitement to commit genocide. In April 2022, the state news agency RIA Novosti published an infamous article titled "What Russia Should Do with Ukraine." It served as a horrifyingly explicit blueprint, calling for the "liquidation" of the Ukrainian military and political elite, the mass "re-education" of a population "guilty" of "passive Nazism," and the complete eradication of the name "Ukraine" itself. This was not a fringe opinion piece; it was a mission statement published by the official voice of the Kremlin. High-ranking officials, like Dmitry Medvedev, regularly call for the complete "disappearance" of Ukraine from the map.

This relentless flood of state-sponsored hatred is a direct violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention, which explicitly lists "direct and public incitement to commit genocide" as a punishable act. The language used by the Russian state provides the crucial legal context for its actions. The mass graves in Bucha, the kidnapping of children, and the shelling of cities are not random acts of war. They are the logical conclusion of a state-run campaign of annihilation, one whose murderous intent has been declared to the entire world.

Weaponizing Winter and Hunger: Destroying the Conditions of Life

The legal definition of genocide includes an act less direct, but no less deadly, than outright killing: "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part." This clause recognizes that you can destroy a people by making it impossible for them to survive. This is precisely the strategy Russia has employed against the Ukrainian people through the systematic weaponization of winter, hunger, and essential services.

Beginning in the autumn of 2022, Russia launched a massive and coordinated missile and drone campaign with one primary target: Ukraine's civilian energy infrastructure. The attacks were not aimed at military positions but at power plants, heating stations, and water facilities across the country. The timing was deliberate and cruel, designed to plunge the nation into darkness and cold at the onset of winter. The calculated goal was to make life unlivable for millions of civilians, to deprive them of heat, light, and running water in sub-zero temperatures. This was not a military strategy; it was an act of mass terror designed to break the civilian population by inflicting conditions that cause widespread suffering, illness, and death.

Alongside this assault on energy, Russia has waged a parallel war on Ukraine's ability to feed itself. This includes the naval blockade of Black Sea ports to stop grain exports, the deliberate targeting of grain silos and agricultural infrastructure with missile strikes, and the widespread theft of grain and farm equipment from occupied territories. For a nation known as the "breadbasket of Europe," this attack on its food supply is an existential threat.

This strategy finds a chilling historical echo in the Holodomor, the man-made terror-famine engineered by the Soviet Union in 1932-33 that killed millions of Ukrainians. Once again, a Moscow-based regime is using food and the denial of basic sustenance as a weapon to crush Ukraine's national will.

When combined, these actions reveal a clear pattern. The obliteration of cities like Mariupol, bombed into an uninhabitable wasteland; the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam, which flooded farmland and cut off water supplies; the persistent attacks on heat and power—all are part of a unified strategy. They are a deliberate effort to create conditions of life so brutal that the Ukrainian people cannot endure them. It is an attempt to achieve physical destruction not just with bullets and bombs, but with cold, hunger, and darkness. It is genocide by attrition.

A War on Memory: The Destruction of Culture as an Act of Genocide

When we think of war crimes, we often picture attacks on civilians, hospitals, or the use of illegal weapons. But another, more insidious form of destruction is taking place across Ukraine: a systematic war on its cultural memory. The deliberate targeting of heritage sites is not merely vandalism or collateral damage; it is a calculated tactic of cultural erasure that stands alongside the logic of genocide.

The very concept of genocide, first articulated by lawyer Raphael Lemkin, was originally intended to be broader than mass murder. In his initial drafts, Lemkin included acts of "cultural genocide"—the deliberate destruction of a group's cultural, linguistic, and spiritual foundations. While this was ultimately not included as a standalone crime in the 1948 Genocide Convention, the intent behind it is central to understanding the legal definition: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group." Erasing a group's culture is a direct method of achieving that destruction.

Culture is the soul of a nation. It is the repository of its history, its values, and its identity. When Russian missiles strike a museum, burn a library containing ancient texts, or demolish a centuries-old church, they are not just destroying bricks and mortar. They are attempting to perform an architectural lobotomy, severing the connection between the Ukrainian people and their past. They are trying to erase the physical evidence that Ukraine has a long, proud, and distinct history, separate from Russia's.

This is a core component of Vladimir Putin's stated war aims, rooted in his ahistorical essays denying Ukraine's very right to exist as a sovereign nation. In occupied territories, this cultural destruction is followed by cultural replacement. Ukrainian monuments are torn down, street names are changed to honor Russian figures, and Ukrainian-language books are removed from schools and libraries. This is the act of an aggressor seeking to prove that no independent Ukrainian culture ever existed, and therefore, no independent Ukrainian people have a right to a future.

This tactic is not new. Throughout history, acts of cultural destruction have been a hallmark of genocidal campaigns and ethnic cleansing. The destruction of the Bridge of Mostar in Bosnia was an attack on the connection between communities. The Taliban's demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas was an attempt to erase a pre-Islamic past. ISIS destroyed ancient sites in Palmyra for the same reason: to annihilate the identity of a people and impose its own vision on a cleansed historical slate.

By destroying Ukraine’s heritage, Russia is signaling that it is not merely trying to conquer territory; it is trying to annihilate an idea—the idea of Ukraine itself. An attack on a people's culture is an attack on their right to exist. It is a fundamental component in the terrible machinery of genocide, aimed at ensuring that even if the people survive, their memory, their story, and their identity will not.

Donate

Your generous donation helps cover the operational costs and secure the future of our volunteer centers. These strategic hubs in Switzerland and Iceland are where our research is conducted and sites and articles like this one are developed and launched. By supporting them, you ensure that we can keep writing, advocating, and inspiring change.

Beneficiary: Charitable Institute, Rif, Iceland

SWIFT (BIC): NBIIISR

IBAN Accounts:

• IS88 0133 3800 0638 6806 2112 80 (Euro)

• IS96 0133 3800 0641 6806 2112 80 (CHF)

• IS26 0133 3800 0639 6806 2112 80 (USD)

Open.Letters.International has more opinion articles about the war

ukraine-russia@charitable.institute